Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 622
Filtrar
1.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2341456, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650460

RESUMO

Few papers focus their attention on VZV vaccination effectiveness among people living with HIV (PLWH). Flanking the live attenuated vaccine (VZL) available, a newly recombinant vaccine (RZV) was recently introduced and approved for HZ prevention among adults. PLWH represents a population on which a particular attention should be applied, in order to guarantee the vaccine efficacy and safety. We performed a literature search in USNLM, PubMed, PubMed Central, PMC and Cochrane Library. From all the publications found eligible, data were extracted and processed per population, vaccine type, immunogenicity and ADRs. The review of the 13 included studies shows that both RZV and VZL are immunogenic and have an acceptable safety profile in adults and children living with HIV. However, given the lack of research available about vaccine efficacy in preventing VZV and HZ in PLWH, additional studies need to be performed, in order to achieve a full completeness of data.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster , Herpes Zoster , Vacinas Atenuadas , Vacinas Sintéticas , Humanos , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Eficácia de Vacinas , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Adulto , Criança , Vacinação , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Varicela/efeitos adversos
2.
Rev Med Virol ; 34(3): e2538, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658176

RESUMO

Serious adverse events following vaccination include medical complications that require hospitalisation. The live varicella vaccine that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States in 1995 has an excellent safety record. Since the vaccine is a live virus, adverse events are more common in immunocompromised children who are vaccinated inadvertently. This review includes only serious adverse events in children considered to be immunocompetent. The serious adverse event called varicella vaccine meningitis was first reported in a hospitalised immunocompetent child in 2008. When we carried out a literature search, we found 15 cases of immunocompetent children and adolescents with varicella vaccine meningitis; the median age was 11 years. Eight of the children had received two varicella vaccinations. Most of the children also had a concomitant herpes zoster rash, although three did not. The children lived in the United States, Greece, Germany, Switzerland, and Japan. During our literature search, we found five additional cases of serious neurological events in immunocompetent children; these included 4 cases of progressive herpes zoster and one case of acute retinitis. Pulses of enteral corticosteroids as well as a lack of herpes simplex virus antibody may be risk factors for reactivation in immunocompetent children. All 20 children with adverse events were treated with acyclovir and recovered; 19 were hospitalised and one child was managed as an outpatient. Even though the number of neurological adverse events remains exceedingly low following varicella vaccination, we recommend documentation of those caused by the vaccine virus.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela , Humanos , Vacina contra Varicela/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Criança , Adolescente , Ativação Viral/efeitos dos fármacos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Pré-Escolar , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Aciclovir/uso terapêutico , Aciclovir/efeitos adversos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Meningite Viral/virologia , Meningite Viral/etiologia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Varicela/virologia , Masculino , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/virologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/etiologia , Feminino
3.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 824, 2022 02 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35149692

RESUMO

Varicella caused by the primary infection of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) exerts a considerable disease burden globally. Current varicella vaccines consisting of the live-attenuated vOka strain of VZV are generally safe and effective. However, vOka retains full neurovirulence and can establish latency and reactivate to cause herpes zoster in vaccine recipients, raising safety concerns. Here, we rationally design a live-attenuated varicella vaccine candidate, v7D. This virus replicates like wild-type virus in MRC-5 fibroblasts and human PBMCs, the carrier for VZV dissemination, but is severely impaired for infection of human skin and neuronal cells. Meanwhile, v7D shows immunogenicity comparable to vOka both in vitro and in multiple small animal species. Finally, v7D is proven well-tolerated and immunogenic in nonhuman primates. Our preclinical data suggest that v7D is a promising candidate as a safer live varicella vaccine with reduced risk of vaccine-related complications, and could inform the design of other herpes virus vaccines.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Varicela/imunologia , Pele/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Fibroblastos , Cobaias , Herpes Zoster/virologia , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Pulmão , Masculino , Camundongos , Neurônios/patologia , Coelhos , Ratos , Pele/patologia , Vacinação , Vacinas Virais
4.
Pediatrics ; 148(6)2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34851413

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Safety studies assessing the association between the entire recommended childhood immunization schedule and autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), are lacking. To examine the association between the recommended immunization schedule and T1DM, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of children born between 2004 and 2014 in 8 US health care organizations that participate in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. METHODS: Three measures of the immunization schedule were assessed: average days undervaccinated (ADU), cumulative antigen exposure, and cumulative aluminum exposure. T1DM incidence was identified by International Classification of Disease codes. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze associations between the 3 exposure measures and T1DM incidence. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Models were adjusted for sex, race and ethnicity, birth year, mother's age, birth weight, gestational age, number of well-child visits, and study site. RESULTS: In a cohort of 584 171 children, the mean ADU was 38 days, the mean cumulative antigen exposure was 263 antigens (SD = 54), and the mean cumulative aluminum exposure was 4.11 mg (SD = 0.73). There were 1132 incident cases of T1DM. ADU (aHR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02) and cumulative antigen exposure (aHR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00) were not associated with T1DM. Cumulative aluminum exposure >3.00 mg was inversely associated with T1DM (aHR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The recommended schedule is not positively associated with the incidence of T1DM in children. These results support the safety of the recommended childhood immunization schedule.


Assuntos
Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Esquemas de Imunização , Vacinas/imunologia , Adolescente , Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Antígenos/imunologia , Peso ao Nascer , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Intervalos de Confiança , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/etnologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/etiologia , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Idade Materna , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/imunologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Hesitação Vacinal , Vacinas/química
5.
Viruses ; 13(11)2021 11 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34835092

RESUMO

Varicella vaccine meningitis is an uncommon delayed adverse event of vaccination. Varicella vaccine meningitis has been diagnosed in 12 children, of whom 3 were immunocompromised. We now report two additional cases of vaccine meningitis in twice-immunized immunocompetent children and we perform further testing on a prior third case. We used three methods to diagnose or investigate cases of varicella vaccine meningitis, none of which have been used previously on this disease. These include metagenomic next-generation sequencing and cytokine multiplex profiling of cerebrospinal fluid and immunology exome analysis of white blood cells. In one new case, the diagnosis was confirmed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid. Both varicella vaccine virus and human herpesvirus 7 DNA were detected. We performed cytokine multiplex profiling on the cerebrospinal fluid of two cases and found ten elevated biomarkers: interferon gamma, interleukins IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17F, chemokines CXCL-9, CXCL-10, CCL-2, and G-CSF. In a second new case, we performed immunology exome sequencing on a panel of 356 genes, but no errors were found. After a review of all 14 cases, we concluded that (i) there is no common explanation for this adverse event, but (ii) ingestion of an oral corticosteroid burst 3-4 weeks before onset of vaccine meningitis may be a risk factor in some cases.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/efeitos adversos , Citocinas/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Meningite Viral/etiologia , Meningite Viral/imunologia , Adolescente , Biomarcadores/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Criança , Feminino , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Imunocompetência , Masculino , Metagenômica , Sequenciamento do Exoma
6.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0256642, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34673809

RESUMO

Varicella infection is a highly contagious disease which, whilst mild in most cases, can cause severe complications. Varicella vaccination is available privately in Sweden and is currently being reviewed for inclusion in the Swedish Public Health Agency's national immunisation program (NIP). A cross-sectional study of parents of Swedish children aged 1-8 years (n = 2212) was conducted to understand parental acceptance, beliefs and knowledge around varicella infection and vaccination. Respondents generally viewed varicella infection as a mild disease, with only a small proportion aware of potential severe complications. While 65% of respondents were aware of the vaccine, only 15% had started the course of vaccination as of February 2019. Further, 43% of parents did not intend to vaccinate, most commonly due to lack of inclusion in the NIP, but also due to perception of mild disease. Nevertheless, if offered within the NIP, 85% of parents would be highly likely to vaccinate their child. A number of statistically significant differences in awareness and behaviours were observed between sociodemographic subgroups. In general, women were more aware of vaccination (72%) compared to men (58%). Among unemployed or respondents with elementary school education, awareness was below 43%, and among respondents with high income the awareness was above 75%. Similarly, among unemployed or respondents with a low income the vaccination rate was as low as 30% compared with at least 57% among respondents with a high income. Respondents from metropolitan areas, those with university degrees and respondents with a higher income were more likely to be aware of the varicella vaccine and to have vaccinated their child. Whilst inclusion in the NIP is clearly the main driver for uptake, these identified knowledge gaps should inform educational efforts to ensure that all parents are informed of the availability and benefits of the varicella vaccine independent of socioeconomic status.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pais/psicologia , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , População Rural , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suécia , População Urbana
7.
J Korean Med Sci ; 36(36): e222, 2021 Sep 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34519184

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite high coverage (~98%) of universal varicella vaccination (UVV) in the Republic of Korea since 2005, reduction in the incidence rate of varicella is not obvious. The study aimed to evaluate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of one-dose UVV by timeline and severity of the disease. METHODS: All children born in Korea in 2011 were included for this retrospective cohort study that analyzed insurance claims data from 2011-2018 and the varicella vaccination records in the immunization registry. Adjusted hazard ratios by Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the VE through propensity score matching by the month of birth, sex, healthcare utilization rate, and region. RESULTS: Of the total 421,070 newborns in the 2011 birth cohort, 13,360 were matched for age, sex, healthcare utilization rate, and region by the propensity score matching method. A total of 55,940 (13.29%) children were diagnosed with varicella, with the incidence rate 24.2 per 1000 person-year; 13.4% of vaccinated children and 10.4% of unvaccinated children. The VE of one-dose UVV against any varicella was 86.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.4-89.5) during the first year after vaccination and 49.9% (95% CI, 43.3-55.7) during the 6-year follow-up period since vaccination, resulting in a 7.2% annual decrease of VE. The overall VE for severe varicella was 66.3%. The VE of two-dose compared to one-dose was 73.4% (95% CI, 72.2-74.6). CONCLUSION: We found lower long-term VE in one-dose vaccination and waning of effectiveness over time. Longer follow ups of the vaccinated children as well as appropriately designed studies are needed to establish the optimal strategy in preventing varicella in Korea.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Eficácia de Vacinas/estatística & dados numéricos , Coorte de Nascimento , Varicela/epidemiologia , Varicela/imunologia , Varicela/patologia , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Pontuação de Propensão , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Vacinação
8.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 20(9): 1177-1183, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34343035

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It remains hesitant to include a two-dose varicella vaccine (VarV) in a national routine immunization program in China. We aimed to quantify the impact of the two-dose VarV on varicella incidence in Shanghai. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We directly extracted the data of varicella cases and VarV doses in 2013-2020 in Shanghai, and then estimated the effects of two-dose VarV using a Serfling model. RESULTS: A two-dose VarV immunization program has been extensively implemented since October 2017 and become free since August 2018 in Shanghai. Before and after this program, varicella cases significantly declined in children (P < 0.01), whereas did not in adults aged >18 years (P = 0.22). Compared to the predicted number of varicella cases, actual number was significantly lower by 8% in 2018 and 28% in 2019. Among children aged 4-6 years, the reduction in varicella cases was largest. Moreover, there was a significant reduction in varicella cases throughout 2020 (P < 0.001), in which the decrease due to social distancing for the COVID-19 was 54%. CONCLUSIONS: A two-dose VarV immunization program may further reduce approximately one-third of varicella cases in Shanghai. Children <4 years and adults benefit less in this program, which warrants enhancing the immunization.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Varicela/epidemiologia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China/epidemiologia , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Distanciamento Físico
9.
PLoS One ; 16(7): e0254080, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34237090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Norway has not implemented universal varicella vaccination, despite the considerable clinical and economic burden of varicella disease. METHODS: An existing dynamic transmission model of varicella infection was calibrated to age-specific seroprevalence rates in Norway. Six two-dose vaccination strategies were considered, consisting of combinations of two formulations each of a monovalent varicella vaccine (Varivax® or Varilrix®) and a quadrivalent vaccine against measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (ProQuad® or PriorixTetra®), with the first dose given with a monovalent vaccine at age 15 months, and the second dose with either a monovalent or quadrivalent vaccine at either 18 months, 7 or 11 years. Costs were considered from the perspectives of both the health care system and society. Quality-adjusted life-years saved and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios relative to no vaccination were calculated. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of vaccine efficacy, price, the costs of a lost workday and of inpatient and outpatient care, vaccination coverage, and discount rate. RESULTS: In the absence of varicella vaccination, the annual incidence of natural varicella is estimated to be 1,359 per 100,000 population, and the cumulative numbers of varicella outpatient cases, hospitalizations, and deaths over 50 years are projected to be 1.81 million, 10,161, and 61, respectively. Universal varicella vaccination is projected to reduce the natural varicella incidence rate to 48-59 per 100,000 population, depending on the vaccination strategy, and to reduce varicella outpatient cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by 75-85%, 67-79%, and 75-79%, respectively. All strategies were cost-saving, with the most cost-saving as two doses of Varivax® at 15 months and 7 years (payer perspective) and two doses of Varivax® at 15 months and 18 months (societal perspective). CONCLUSIONS: All modeled two-dose varicella vaccination strategies are projected to lead to substantial reductions in varicella disease and to be cost saving compared to no vaccination in Norway.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/economia , Modelos Imunológicos , Vacinação/economia , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Herpes Zoster/economia , Herpes Zoster/epidemiologia , Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Herpes Zoster/mortalidade , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Noruega/epidemiologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos
10.
Pediatr Transplant ; 25(7): e14070, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34120389

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: LAVV have historically been avoided in children after solid organ transplantation. However, it has been reported that post-transplant, children without severe immunosuppression can generate anti-varicella antibody after immunization but the duration of the response is not clear. Furthermore, the origin of the varicella virus in immunosuppressed patients who develop varicella after vaccination is often unclear. CLINICAL PROGRESS: A female child received LAVV 30 months after a living donor liver transplant at the age of 2 months. Varicella rash appeared on the trunk 16 days after vaccination and gradually spread over the body. The patient was treated with intravenous acyclovir followed by oral therapy and recovered fully. The virus detected in blisters was derived from the vaccine-type strain. Paired sera before and after the onset of varicella showed an increase in antibody titer. However, 2 years after onset, the antibody titer decreased to undetectable again. CONCLUSIONS: This was an informative case of varicella due to vaccine strain attenuated virus. Antibody levels were not maintained over many years. Although varicella was caused by the vaccine-type strain, repeated vaccinations may be necessary for post-transplant patients who develop varicella.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Herpes Zoster/etiologia , Transplante de Fígado , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Doadores Vivos
11.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 475, 2021 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34034659

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chickenpox is a highly contagious disease caused by the varicella zoster virus (VZV), and in infants, adolescents, adults, pregnant women, and the immunocompromised it can be serious. The best way to prevent chickenpox is immunization with the varicella vaccine. Protective levels of antibodies induced by the varicella vaccine decline over time, but there is currently no formal recommendation for testing anti-varicella zoster virus (VZV) IgG levels in immunized healthcare workers (HCWs). METHODS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the seroprevalence of circulating anti-VZV IgG in a sample a sample of students and residents of the medical school of the University of Bari, the long-term immunogenicity of the varicella vaccine, and the effectiveness of a strategy consisting of a third vaccine booster dose. The study population was screened as part of a biological risk assessment conducted between April 2014 and October 2020. A strategy for the management of non-responders was also examined. RESULTS: The 182 students and residents included in the study had a documented history of immunization (two doses of varicella vaccine). The absence of anti-VZV IgG was determined in 34% (62/182; 95%CI = 27.2-41.4%), with serosusceptibility more common among males than females (p < 0.05). After a third varicella dose, seroconversion was achieved in 100% of this previously seronegative group. No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of the study population immunized against VZV lacked a protective antibody titer, but a third dose of vaccine restored protection. Since it is highly unlikely that VZV will be eliminated in the immediate future, the loss of immunity in a substantial portion of the population implies a risk of varicella outbreaks in the coming years. Screening for varicella immunity in routine assessments of the biological risk of medical students and HCWs may help to prevent nosocomial VZV infections.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Varicela/epidemiologia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Pessoal de Saúde , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Imunização Secundária/métodos , Vacinação/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Varicela/sangue , Varicela/virologia , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
12.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 57(1): 26-32, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33797401

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The rubella test during pregnancy makes it possible to identify situations at risk of congenital rubella and those pregnant mothers who should be offered the MMR vaccine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Authors analysed test coverage and the immunity status of pregnant mothers between 2005 and 2017, using birth attendance certificates. RESULTS: Rubella test coverage on 61,437 pregnant mothers was 99.4%. The average proportion of susceptible subjects was 6.4%. Seroconversion was observed in 7 cases, with 1 confirmed case of congenital rubella. 32% of susceptible subjects were vaccinated, and adherence was seen to be influenced by the characteristics of the pregnant women and of the maternity unit. CONCLUSIONS: A current information flow including a number of healthcare services, is useful both for monitoring the maternity care pathway and for public health purposes.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/imunologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/diagnóstico , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Soroconversão , Vacinas Combinadas/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
13.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e90, 2021 04 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33814028

RESUMO

Invasive meningococcal disease has high morbidity and mortality, with infants and young children among those at greatest risk. This phase III, open-label, randomised study in toddlers aged 12-23 months evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of meningococcal tetanus toxoid-conjugate vaccine (MenACYW-TT), a tetanus toxoid conjugated vaccine against meningococcal serogroups A, C, W and Y, when coadministered with paediatric vaccines (measles, mumps and rubella [MMR]; varicella [V]; 6-in-1 combination vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b [DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib] and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV13])(NCT03205371). Immunogenicity to each meningococcal serogroup was assessed by serum bactericidal antibody assay using human complement (hSBA). Vaccine safety profiles were described up to 30 days post-vaccination. A total of 1183 participants were enrolled. The proportion with seroprotection (hSBA ≥1:8) to each meningococcal serogroup at Day 30 was comparable between the MenACYW-TT and MenACYW-TT + MMR + V groups (≥92 and ≥96%, respectively), between the MenACYW-TT and MenACYW-TT + DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib groups (≥90% for both) and between the MenACYW-TT and MenACYW-TT + PCV13 groups (≥91 and ≥84%, respectively). The safety profiles of MenACYW-TT, and MMR + V, DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib, and PCV13, with or without MenACYW-TT, were generally comparable. Coadministration of MenACYW-TT with paediatric vaccines in toddlers had no clinically relevant effect on the immunogenicity and safety of any of the vaccines.


Assuntos
Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Neisseria meningitidis/imunologia , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/imunologia , Feminino , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/imunologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/imunologia , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Lactente , Masculino , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/imunologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/imunologia , Segurança , Sorogrupo , Vacinas Combinadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Combinadas/imunologia
14.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 12, 2021 Jan 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33407202

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, several countries have initiated universal varicella vaccination (UVV) programs in infants. In 2019, the Swiss National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) decided to start evaluating the introduction of universal varicella vaccination. There is a theoretical concern that suboptimal vaccination coverage could lead to a shift in the varicella incidence to older age groups, thereby potentially increasing complication rates. To achieve a high vaccination coverage rate, it is important that practicing physicians comply with a potential recommendation for UVV. We studied the perception of varicella and the current vaccination behavior among Swiss pediatricians and general practitioners (GPs) who treat children. We also assessed their intention to advise parents to vaccinate their children against varicella in the event the Swiss NITAG will recommend UVV. METHODS: Primary data was collected through a structured, 20-min online survey with Swiss pediatricians and GPs who treat children. RESULTS: 150 physicians participated in the study: 40 GPs in the German-speaking part, 20 GPs in the French-speaking part, 67 pediatricians in the German-speaking part, and 23 pediatricians in the French-speaking part. The majority (64%) of all participants reported that they currently recommend varicella vaccination for risk groups according to the national immunization plan. About one third of physicians (35%) - predominantly pediatricians - currently already recommend it for all infants. In these situations, a measles, mumps, rubella, varicella combination vaccine is currently used by 58% for the first dose and by 59% for the second dose. 86% of participants stated that they would advise parents to have their children vaccinated against varicella in case of a recommendation for UVV by the Swiss NITAG. 68% responded that they expect many questions from parents and 65% agreed that they have good arguments to convey the importance of varicella vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The survey study results show that most participating pediatricians and GPs indicated a favorable attitude towards childhood vaccination against varicella in the setting of a Swiss NITAG recommendation for UVV. This data shows the importance of NITAG recommendations in influencing vaccine education and supporting achievement of high coverage of varicella vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/uso terapêutico , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Clínicos Gerais/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Pediatras/psicologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Varicela/epidemiologia , Varicela/virologia , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Incidência , Masculino , Pais/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suíça/epidemiologia , Vacinas Combinadas/imunologia , Vacinas Combinadas/uso terapêutico
15.
Pediatr Transplant ; 25(5): e13937, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33314516

RESUMO

Recent guidelines suggest that LAVs may be given to LT recipients meeting certain criteria. However, information is still limited. We sought to evaluate the safety of LAVs, including measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella to LT recipients following our clinically based immunization protocol for LT recipients. We conducted a case-series analysis on safety of LAVs for measles, rubella, varicella, and mumps given to LT recipients at our institution from July 2010 to July 2019. Patients who underwent LT at age <20 years who visited our immunization clinic were included. LT recipients were vaccinated if 2 years had lapsed from LT, had no signs of rejection within 6 months, and were on minimal immunosuppressants. Patient demographics, underlying diseases, type and number of vaccines administered, date of vaccination, and adverse events occurring within 4 weeks after vaccination were extracted from their medical records. During the study period, LAVs were administered 422 times to 209 patients who met criteria and included 225 doses of MR combination vaccine, 224 doses of varicella vaccine, and 215 doses of mumps vaccine. Underlying diseases included cholestatic liver diseases (n = 125), followed by metabolic diseases (n = 33) and acute liver failure (n = 19). Nine non-critical adverse events (2.1%) possibly associated with LAVs were reported, but there were no serious adverse events, including hospitalizations or deaths. In conclusion, LAVs administered to LT recipients were safe without any serious adverse events following our relatively simple institutional protocol.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Esquemas de Imunização , Transplante de Fígado , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Lactente , Japão , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
16.
Multimedia | Recursos Multimídia | ID: multimedia-7163

RESUMO

Historicamente, diversos calendários de vacinação foram propostos pelo Programa Nacional de Imunizações em função de diferentes circunstâncias, tais como: situação epidemiológica, mudanças nas indicações das vacinas ou incorporação de novas vacinas. Para o ano de 2018, a Coordenação-Geral do Programa Nacional de Imunizações (CGPNI) informa mudanças para as seguintes vacinas do Calendário Nacional de Vacinação: vacina varicela, febre amarela e meningocócica C


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/provisão & distribuição , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Vacina contra Febre Amarela/imunologia , Vacina Quadrivalente Recombinante contra HPV tipos 6, 11, 16, 18/imunologia , Meningites Bacterianas/imunologia
17.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi ; 41(7): 1138-1144, 2020 Jul 10.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32741184

RESUMO

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of 1 dose varicella attenuated live vaccine (VarV) for healthy children aged 1-12 years in China and explore the application of the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework in observational studies of vaccine effectiveness (VE). Methods: We searched studies about the VE of 1-dose VarV for children aged 1-12 years in China which published before 2019 and evaluated the quality of the studies by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) table. We used Meta-analysis models to obtain the pooled 1-dose VE and that in subgroups by study design, outbreak or not, study quality and age of subjects. The evidences of VEs were rated by means of the GRADE system. Results: Thirty-two studies were included and the pooled 1-dose VE was 75% [95% confidence interval (CI): 68%-80%]. The VE of outbreak studies [VE=66% (95%CI: 57%-73%)] was lower than non-outbreak studies [VE=85% (95%CI: 78%-89%)], and the VE in <6 years old children [VE=84% (95%CI:77%-89%)] was higher than that in ≥6 years old children [VE=60% (95%CI: 51%-68%)]. There was no significant difference in VE among studies with different design and quality. The quality of the evidences of pooled 1-dose VE was"very low", which was downgraded in bias risk and inconsistency and not downgraded in indirectness, imprecision and publication bias. Conclusions: The 1-dose VarV can provide medium level protection for 1-12 years old children in China, but it will decrease significantly for ≥6 years old children, so it is suggested to implement the strategies of two-dose vaccination of VarV in children <6 years old. The GRADE framework can be used in the observational studies of VE and it is suggested that the technical guidelines of observational study should be worked out to improve the overall quality of evidence.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Varicela/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China/epidemiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta Imunológica , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia
18.
J Child Neurol ; 35(13): 889-895, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32677551

RESUMO

Varicella-zoster virus vaccination is recommended for virtually all young children in the United States, Canada, and several other countries. Varicella vaccine is a live attenuated virus that retains some of its neurotropic properties. Herpes zoster caused by vaccine virus still occurs in immunized children, although the rate is much lower than in children who had wild-type varicella. It was commonly thought that 2 varicella vaccinations would protect children against the most serious complication of meningitis following herpes zoster; however, 2 meningitis cases have already been published. We now report a third case of varicella vaccine meningitis and define risk factors shared by all 3 immunized adolescents. The diagnosis in cerebrospinal fluid in this third case was verified by amplifying and sequencing portions of the viral genome, to document fixed alleles found only in the vaccine strain. Viral antibody was also detected in the cerebrospinal fluid by confocal microscopy. When compared with the other 2 cases, remarkably all 3 were 14 years old when meningitis occurred. All 3 were treated with intravenous acyclovir, with complete recovery. The adolescent in our case report also had recurrent asthma, which was treated with both prednisone tablets and beclomethasone inhaler before onset of meningitis. When the 3 cases were considered together, they suggested that immunity to varicella-zoster virus may be waning sufficiently in some twice-immunized adolescents to make them vulnerable to varicella vaccine virus reactivation and subsequent meningitis. This complication rarely happens in children after wild-type varicella.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/efeitos adversos , Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Imunocompetência/imunologia , Meningite/etiologia , Meningite/imunologia , Aciclovir/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Meningite/tratamento farmacológico , Valaciclovir/uso terapêutico
19.
Front Immunol ; 11: 628, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32362894

RESUMO

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in childhood and adolescence is a rare malignancy that can successfully be treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib. According to the current experience, treatment is necessary for years and, in the majority of cases, a lifelong approach is required to control the malignant disease. To what extent imatinib causes immunosuppression in different age cohorts is a controversial discussion. According to general medical recommendations, live vaccines are contraindicated in individuals treated with imatinib. However, a recent increase in the number of globally reported cases of measles has been observed and continues to rise. Due to the high contagiousness of the virus, near-perfect vaccination coverage (herd immunity of 93 to 95%) is required to effectively protect against measles resurgence-a scenario that is not realistic in many countries. When four teenagers with CML (median age 13 years, range 12-15) who were enrolled into pediatric trial CML-paed II while on imatinib treatment (median treatment duration 36 months, range 11-84) were identified without protective measles and/or varicella titers, we carefully balanced the risks of a live vaccination under immunosuppressive TKI medication against the benefit of being protected. The patients underwent live vaccination with the live attenuated vaccines M-M-RVAX Pro® and Varivax® simultaneously (Patient #1), Priorix® and Varilix® consecutively (Patient #2), and Priorix® (Patients #3 and #4). While the first three patients were vaccinated while receiving TKI therapy, treatment with imatinib was interrupted in patient #4 for 1 week prior and 2 weeks after vaccination. Patients #1 and #3 reacted with stable long-term seroconversion. In Patient #2, serum titer conversion against measles and varicella could not be demonstrated and thus revaccination with Priorix® and Varilix® was performed 3 years later. However, protective titers did not develop or were lost again. Patient #4 also lost protective titers against measles when assessed 10 months after vaccination, but revaccination resulted in stable seroprotective titers over 12 months after the last vaccination during ongoing imatinib treatment. We conclude that in all patients, the safety of live vaccines could be documented, as no acute or late adverse events were observed. However, in line with observations that memory B-cells are lost under exposure to imatinib, revaccination may become necessary (two out of four patients in this small series lost their seroprotection). Considering that the number of cases is very small, we also suggest some criteria for decision-making regarding live vaccinations of CML patients treated with imatinib.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapêutico , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/terapia , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Adolescente , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Memória Imunológica , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Masculino , Soroconversão , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinação
20.
Biomed Res Int ; 2020: 6183936, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32462005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Varicella vaccine is available for voluntary purchase with a single dose currently recommended for children aged ≥12 months. An epidemiological study was undertaken in order to determine the characteristics of the outbreak, assess vaccine effectiveness, and examine risk factors for vaccine failure. METHODS: A varicella case was defined as a generalized papulovesicular rash (without other apparent causes) in a child without prior varicella attending the kindergarten during February 22 to April 7 of 2016. Varicella among vaccinated children (breakthrough varicella) was defined as varicella occurring >42 days after vaccination. Children's vaccination status was verified with immunization records through local vaccination information platform. RESULTS: Of the 738 children, 664 (90.0%) had no prior varicella history. Of these, 364 (54.8%) had received a single-dose varicella vaccine before outbreak. A total of 30 cases occurred in the outbreak, and 9 of them (30%) had breakthrough varicella. Age at vaccination (<15 months vs. ≥15 months) and time since vaccination before the outbreak (<3 years vs. ≥3 years) were not related to the occurrence of breakthrough varicella (P > 0.05). Single-dose varicella vaccination was 64.7% effective in preventing any varicella. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose varicella vaccine is effective in reducing the varicella attack rate, but not high enough to prevent outbreak. Timely detection and effective isolation are key factors in controlling varicella. Improving single-dose vaccination coverage and implementing two-dose vaccination strategy should be recommended to provide excellent protection to prevent varicella in the future in Suzhou.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Varicela/epidemiologia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Instituições Acadêmicas , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...